When Compute Becomes Self-Aware

Software no longer blindly executes instructions. It observes the pathways it actually runs, understands how input data changes execution, and adapts in real time to achieve the best possible outcome.

Observe

Sees the execution pathways your software actually takes.

Understand

Learns how data shape, hardware, and runtime conditions affect behavior.

Adapt

Adjusts execution dynamically to pursue the best outcome in real time.

SelfAware Compute improves compute throughput and predictability — slashing power consumption while accelerating the speed of execution.

In lab tests, SelfAware reduces energy consumption by as much as 91%.

Matrix Multiply

2989521605225929123566Energy (Ws)1611151920Core countOptimal core: 19Energy: 331.44 Ws
Energy Saved
0.00%
at 19 cores
Serial
3,241.39 Ws
baseline · 1 core
Optimized
331.44 Ws
at optimal core

SelfAware Compute Optimizes Software for the Environment the Software Runs In

Software doesn't run in a vacuum - it runs on real hardware with real-world constraints. SelfAware Compute dynamically optimizes execution for the specific environment in which software operates, improving performance, reducing energy consumption, or achieving the optimal balance between the two.

Everyone's Focused on
Making Hardware Faster.
Few Have Focused on
Optimizing How Software
Actually Runs.

For decades, the industry has focused on: Smaller transistors, Higher clock speeds, More cores, Faster interconnects

But software execution itself — the way processors step through machine code — has remained fundamentally unmanaged.

Processors execute instructions.

They do not understand execution pathways.

SelfAware Compute does.

Compute has expanded. Optimization has not.

Five fundamental principals that make SelfAware Compute a foundation for modern compute.

Ubiquitous by Design

SelfAware Compute applies everywhere compute runs.

From Cloud to Edge. From Watts to Milliwatts.

Compute is expanding across every layer of modern systems. Cloud infrastructure, industrial equipment, field systems, and personal devices all rely on software execution.

  • Hyperscale + enterprise workloads
  • Industrial plants + real-time systems
  • Field equipment + rugged edge compute
  • Personal devices + local execution
World map
Cloud Server
Industrial System
Field Equipment
Personal Device
Edge Node
IoT Device
Slide 1Slide 2Slide 3

Cross-Industry Impact

Any domain. Same advantage.

Every vertical is becoming computational.

As software becomes the control plane for the physical world, performance and efficiency become strategic—across mission-critical and specialized systems.

  • Defense + national security systems
  • Enterprise + infrastructure software
  • Biotech + genomics + scientific computing
  • AI + IoT + robotics + edge networks

No New Hardware

No silicon redesign required.

Optimize software. Not silicon.

SelfAware Compute improves execution on your target architecture—without a chip redesign, fabrication cycle, manufacturing ramp, or ecosystem migration.

  • No new hardware development cycle
  • No new manufacturing or supply chain risk
  • No platform fragmentation for users
  • Ship improvements as software updates
Software over silicon — no hardware redesign required
Serial vs parallel execution pathways

Beyond Parallelization

More than parallelism.

Whole-program optimization: serial + parallel.

SelfAware Compute doesn’t just ‘add threads.’ It optimizes the serial path and extracts safe parallel execution where it exists—improving throughput and predictability.

  • Optimize serial bottlenecks
  • Extract safe parallel execution pathways
  • Control synchronization only where necessary
  • Improve predictability and utilization

Automatic Optimization

Adoption without retraining.

No parallel programming required.

Teams shouldn’t have to rewrite systems around new models or train on niche frameworks. SelfAware Compute optimization is automatic—software stays software.

  • No kernel rewrites or framework lock-in
  • No training teams on new parallel models
  • Works with existing code structure
  • Clear, auditable transformations
Adoption without retraining — no parallel programming required
Execution intelligence

Software has never decided how it should run.

SelfAware Compute adds an execution intelligence layer above the compiler.
It understands the workload, models the execution pathways,
and chooses how software should behave before the compiler turns that decision
into machine-level execution.

SelfAware Compute

Decision layer

Understands inputs, software structure, hardware limits, and goals like time, energy, and memory. Then selects the execution strategy that best fits this run.

Understands inputs
Models execution paths
Chooses strategy
Controls resources
Compiler

Translation layer

Takes the chosen execution plan and emits efficient instructions for the target machine. The compiler makes the decision executable.

Code
IR
Optimization passes
Machine code
Target execution
Processor / Machine

SelfAware Compute decides how your program should run. The compiler makes that decision real.

Works across your stack

One execution intelligence layer
across the lifecycle.

SelfAware Compute is not a replacement for compilers, profilers, analytics, or deployment tooling. It works across the lifecycle and makes the existing stack smarter.

Pathway-aware
Compiler-friendly
Runtime-informed
Analytics-compatible
SelfAware Compute works with the lifecycle — not against it.
Code
Source, algorithms, structure
Build
Toolchains, packaging, integration
Compile
IR, codegen, machine targeting
Test
Validation, profiling, tracing
Deploy
Targets, environments, rollout
Runtime
Execution, adaptation, control
Interactive optimization

Set the goal. The system figures out the rest.

Move the constraints and watch the execution plan adapt. Instead of hardcoding one behavior, SelfAware Compute models the workload, evaluates the pathway, and selects how the software should run for this specific situation.

Recommended cores
12

88.1% effective parallel efficiency for the selected pathway.

Execution strategy
latency-priority pathway

Pathway score 98 / 100 based on current workload and constraints.

Predicted runtime
7.89s

86.3% faster than the serial baseline.

Predicted energy
736 Wh

76.9% lower energy use.

Live readout

Optimization result preview

Time target
Energy target
Memory budget
Runtime
Same code. Different execution strategy.
7.89s
goal 7.00s
Serial baseline57.7s
SelfAware Compute7.89s
Energy
Same code. Different execution strategy.
736 Wh
goal 700 Wh
Serial baseline3,186 Wh
SelfAware Compute736 Wh
Memory
Same code. Different execution strategy.
12.9 GB
goal 32.0 GB
Serial baseline11.7 GB
SelfAware Compute12.9 GB
Cost
Same code. Different execution strategy.
$0.99
Serial baseline$4.42
SelfAware Compute$0.99
Serial baseline runtime57.7s
Serial baseline energy3,186 Wh
Serial baseline memory11.7 GB
Optimized runtime savings86.3%
Optimized energy savings76.9%
Optimized cost savings77.7%